The following partners have contributed to the development of the procedural framework as members of South Tyneside Safeguarding Adults Board

  • South Tyneside Council
  • South Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group
  • Northumbria Police
  • South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust
  • Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
  • Northumbria Community Rehabilitation Company
  • Tyne and Wear Fire and Rescue Services
  • Northumbria Probation Trust
  • South Tyneside Homes
  • North East Ambulance Service
  • South Tyneside Community Safety Partnership

We wish to thank all of the individuals, statutory and non-statutory representatives and agencies whose expertise and time have made this document possible.  In particular we wish to thank the original author of the Pan-London procedures, Lorraine Stanforth, on which these procedures were first based.

Was this helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!

Click here to view useful References to accompany chapters in this APPP.

See also Resources, for a further information.

Was this helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!

1. Introduction

People have a right to know how information will be used and the right to restrict the use of information when exercising choice and control over how they are safeguarded. This may impact on the service that they are offered but it is their right to make an informed choice.

Information governance is subject to a range of legislation, in particular:

Practitioners must be mindful that the information that they collect is lawful and that people are routinely informed about why the information is collected, what will be done with the information and who it is likely to be shared with. Information management requires organisations to have policies and procedures in line with the above. Local authorities and the NHS are required to appoint a Caldicott Guardian to advise and manage its information governance arrangements.

2. Data Protection

See also Data Protection Act chapter

The Data Protection Act 2018 and UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) apply to all organisations in the UK that processes personal information. They go hand in hand with the common law duty of confidence and professional and local confidentiality codes of practice to provide individuals with a statutory route to monitor the use of their personal information. In the UK, the Information Commissioner is responsible for the enforcement of data protection legislation and Freedom of Information Act 2000. Advice and guidance on responding to access to files and freedom of information requests can also be found on the Information Commissioner’s website.

The rights of adults and people alleged to have caused harm including providers are upheld under data protection legislation. This means that people have the right:

  • of access to personal information held about them;
  • to prevent processing likely to cause damage or distress;
  • to have inaccurate data about them corrected, blocked or erased;
  • to prevent processing of information about themselves for purposes of direct marketing.

Applying data protection principles to the safeguarding principles means that people should be advised at the earliest opportunity of any safeguarding concerns. Adult Safeguarding: Sharing Information (SCIE) provides guidance for staff on matters of consent and sharing information with family and friends.

3. Professional Accountability

Every time a record is made of a conversation, observation, telephone call, assessment, professionals should quality assure their own work so it measures up to good information governance:

  • contemporaneous;
  • discerns fact from opinion;
  • compliant with legislation;
  • thorough and relevant;
  • contains up to date details.

Professionals should be confident that if the adult using the service /provider were to view the record, it would be:

  1. evidence based;
  2. written in a professional and respectful manner;
  3. compliant with relevant legislation.

The following questions are a guide.

  • What information do staff need to know in order to provide a high quality response?
  • What information is needed to keep adults safe?
  • What information is not necessary?
  • What is the basis for any decision to share (or not) information with a third party?

Care should be taken to avoid personal opinion and comments. There is a risk that that this type of recording is seen at a later date as fact which cannot be evidenced.

Accuracy is essential, not only for effective safeguarding but ensures resources are not wasted. Using abbreviations is unacceptable unless there is an explanation. Copying of medical notes for example ‘R. sided CVA’ can waste time and impact on the ability to protect someone. Noting that the person has had a stroke and finds it difficult to talk on the telephone is relevant and provides information that is easily understood by everyone. A judgement framework needs to consider facts, how different types of evidence can be corroborated and how information can support a reasonable and rational assessment. Checking with the adult for accuracy is good practice.

Assessments are an ongoing process and therefore there is a need to ensure that information is up to date. Ensuring only one record for one person may be part of auditing. Managers might note any concerns where there are duplicate records and implement an immediate action for data cleansing. When working with providers, it should be borne in mind that they are reliant upon reputation for their business. Accurate recording that can be backed up by examples and corroborated supports defensible practice. All records are subject to the retention guidelines set out by the organisation. Through the auditing process records may be disposed of according to each organisation’s policy. Electronic records should be updated and maintained according to the policy.

Was this helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!